Okay, so, The Arctic
Imperative is a book I’ve finished. Stan? Brian?
I don’t really remember the Energy Crisis in the ‘70s. We were already living in the cabin and
heating with wood. (And by heating, I
mean “hardly heating at all.”) We were already in the habit of buying $2 worth
of gas instead of filling the tank. But
I guess the crisis was a big deal to other people. I remember a TV special called “WE WILL
FREEZE IN THE DARK” and I remember that sounded like a bad thing.
I tried reading The
Arctic Imperative in that context.
Nope. The
“imperative” part of The Arctic
Imperative could be “It’s imperative
that we kill the monster from The Thing” and this would still be a dry, repetitive, pedantic book.
Actually, wait. A
“monster” is one of the metaphorical things that Richard Rohmer actually says the
Arctic Imperative is.
… the Arctic
Imperative is truly a monster out-of-hand.
The Arctic Imperative
is very much alive, it is very much a monster, and it is very much out of
Canada’s control.
A slumbering, frozen
giant… capable of either gripping Canada by its economic throat or, if
controlled, of giving Canada a guiding hand into a prosperous future.
… the slumbering
Arctic resource giant was ready to leave its womb of ice and rock.
The great resource
giant of the Canadian Arctic sleeps no longer.
It is wide-awake, growing rapidly.
It is undisciplined, uncontrolled, and uncoordinated. It must be taken in hand and moulded by
clearly defined national policies and goals designed to benefit all Canadians.
(Last Lines)
And that’s not the only powerful action language in The Arctic Imperative:
The United States is
just entering the foothills of a mountainous range of energy shortages.
Canada is at a
crossroads just as the United States is.
The eyes of Canada
gradually turned north to watch with growing alarm the passage of this
juggernaut that the American elephant was shoving through the remote Arctic
waters of the Canadian North.
Both the US and
Canadian governments then began to withdraw to their respective lairs to wait
for the next Arctic event to bring them forth in a nose-to-nose confrontation.
… the United States
and Canada were locking horns…
… the local people
were starting to flex their muscles and fight back the great steamroller.
The game of oil
pipeline chess is still on and all bets should be left open.
… has Canada as a
nation once again been just too stupid to be able to foresee what it is
allowing to be done to it? It can’t be called rape because rape does not exist
when consent is present.
If there’s one thing I hate, it’s when a clumsy monster rapes
a sleepy giant at the mountainous crossroads.
That’s when all chess bets are off, and I start pushing elephants around with a steamroller.
And what's it all about, in the end? What's Rohmer's point? Canada needs an energy policy, and the policy should be good for Canadian business.
Why didn't he just say that?
I've been putting off saying anything much about The Arctic Imperative because I haven't much to say. Watch now as I spend nearly everything in a comment. It'll be a short comment… because I haven't much to say.
ReplyDeleteJust what is the Arctic Imperative? It's a monster, an opportunity, a threat and a policy decision to be considered in the Langevin Block. It's happening now, has happened or is about to happen. It can be faced and mastered or it must be accepted because of something John Diefenbaker did. More than anything, The Arctic Imperative is a great sounding title. You know it, I know it and Richard Rohmer knows it. The Arctic Imperative is everything he says it is, even when that doesn't fit the definition of "imperative".